What the estimate looks at
This product is built around a handful of practical inputs: fault, injuries, medical care, lost income, pain impact, and whether a commercial vehicle was involved. It is a triage model, not a full case valuation.
This product is built around a handful of practical inputs: fault, injuries, medical care, lost income, pain impact, and whether a commercial vehicle was involved. It is a triage model, not a full case valuation.
A short review cannot tell you the full medical picture, whether the available insurance is enough, how persuasive the evidence will look later, or how a specific state rule may shape the outcome.
Use the score as a sorting tool. If the facts look modest and settled, the result may be enough for now. If the score looks higher or the facts feel unsettled, it may be worth taking the next step.
The site is built so users can see the estimate first. That keeps the early mobile experience lighter and makes the follow-up step a choice instead of an obligation.
Insurers use internal models that weigh medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering — but they also factor in their own policy limits, state liability rules, and litigation cost estimates. Their number reflects what they are willing to pay, not necessarily what a claim is worth. An independent estimate like this one provides a reference point, not a counter-offer.
No. It is an internal score based on the facts you provide. It is not an offer, a demand, or a prediction of what an insurer will actually pay.
Because uncertainty about fault changes how the whole claim is viewed. A claim with clear fault often reads very differently from one where liability is still being argued about.
They help describe whether the crash stayed minor or became disruptive. The review is trying to measure the shape of the claim, not just the event itself.
Yes. New treatment, a disputed fault story, or more complete records can change how a claim looks. That is one reason to avoid treating the first score as final.
Settlement amounts vary so widely that averages are rarely useful. They depend on the severity of injury, available insurance coverage, fault clarity, and state-specific rules. This site provides a directional estimate — not an average figure and not a prediction.
The review includes a pain impact question. However, pain and suffering valuation in a real claim depends on documentation, treatment records, and state-specific methods that no short form can fully replicate.
Insurers typically weigh medical bills, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering using internal models. Their calculation is not public and varies by company and policy. Independent estimates like this one use similar broad inputs but cannot access your actual policy limits or insurer criteria.
First offers are often made before the full medical picture is known, especially when treatment is still ongoing. This site does not advise you on whether to accept or reject any specific offer. A licensed attorney in your state can review the offer in context.
Read a plain-English guide to the situations that make a crash harder to handle on your own.
Use a practical checklist for the scene, the same day, and the first week after a crash.
Understand why a commercial-vehicle crash can involve more records and more moving parts.
Read a tighter guide to motorcycle claims, documentation, and the fault stories that often follow them.
Use the calculator as a first pass, then decide whether you want anything else after you see the result.